Smith v. Partlow
This text of 2023 Ohio 4598 (Smith v. Partlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Smith v. Partlow, 2023-Ohio-4598.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY
ANTHONY J. SMITH, CASE NO. 2023-P-0090
Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas
MICHAEL A. PARTLOW, ESQ., Trial Court No. 2021 CV 00751 Defendant-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Decided: December 18, 2023 Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Anthony J. Smith, pro se, PID# A484-639, Lake Erie Correctional Institution, 501 Thompson Road, P.O. Box 8000, Conneaut, OH 44030 (Plaintiff-Appellant).
Michael A. Partlow, pro se, 112 South Water Street, Suite C, Kent, Ohio 44240 (Defendant-Appellee).
JOHN J. EKLUND, P.J.
{¶1} On November 6, 2023, appellant, Anthony J. Smith, filed a pro se appeal
from an August 24, 2023 entry.
{¶2} App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for filing
a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court has
held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional
defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 120 Ohio St.3d 499, 2008-Ohio-6810, ¶ 17,
citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio St.3d 58, 60 (1988). {¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal
from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.
3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of
courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the
judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the
time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the appearance
docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 163 Ohio App.3d 659, 664, 2005-Ohio-5360.
{¶4} Here, the trial court issued its entry on August 24, 2023. The clerk of courts
noted on the appearance docket that notice of the entry under Civ.R. 58(B) was issued
to the parties on that same date. Therefore, pursuant Civ.R. 58(B), the time to appeal
began to run from August 24, 2023. The deadline for appellant to file his notice of appeal
was September 25, 2023, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, appellant’s
November 6, 2023 notice of appeal was untimely filed by 42 days.
{¶5} This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.
Pendell, supra at 60; see also App.R. 14(B).
{¶6} Based upon the foregoing, this appeal is dismissed as untimely pursuant to
App.R. 4(A)(1).
MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,
ROBERT J. PATTON, J.,
concur.
Case No. 2023-P-0090
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ohio 4598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-partlow-ohioctapp-2023.