Smith v. Parrish

181 A.D.2d 589

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered February 8, 1991, which quashed defendant’s subpoena for the deposition of non-party Roger Wolfe, M.S.W., unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the IAS court that defendant failed to show unusual or unanticipated circumstances justifying his delay in seeking to depose the non-party witness for more than two months after plaintiffs filing of a certificate of readiness (22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Goldsmith v Howmedica, Inc., 158 AD2d 335). The motion should also be denied for failure to demonstrate circumstances necessitating a non-party deposition (CPLR 3101 [a] [4]), in that defendant did not show that the information sought could not be obtained from other sources. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Kassal, Rubin and Smith JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Parrish, 181 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

181 A.D.2d 589 (Smith v. Parrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldsmith v. Howmedica, Inc.
158 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)