Smith v. Parr Motor Sales, Inc.
This text of 279 A.D. 1118 (Smith v. Parr Motor Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster and Bergan, JJ., concur; Coon, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote for judgment in favor of the plaintiff. In my view no title passed to Marsh, and defendant, experienced in such matters, in accepting the automobile with no indicia of title whatever, save bare possession, may not be considered an innocent purchaser.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 1118, 112 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-parr-motor-sales-inc-nyappdiv-1952.