Smith v. Parr Motor Sales, Inc.
279 A.D. 1118, 112 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6020
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster and Bergan, JJ., concur; Coon, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote for judgment in favor of the plaintiff. In my view no title passed to Marsh, and defendant, experienced in such matters, in accepting the automobile with no indicia of title whatever, save bare possession, may not be considered an innocent purchaser.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Parr Motor Sales, Inc., 279 A.D. 1118, 112 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1118 (Smith v. Parr Motor Sales, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Appleman v. Gabel
24 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)