Smith v. PARENTS & TEACHERS TOGETHER
713 N.W.2d 776, 475 Mich. 859
This text of 713 N.W.2d 776 (Smith v. PARENTS & TEACHERS TOGETHER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. PARENTS & TEACHERS TOGETHER, 713 N.W.2d 776, 475 Mich. 859 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Dale L. SMITH, Next Friend of Juan Rodela, Jr., a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PARENTS & TEACHERS TOGETHER, a/k/a Patt, and Rick McNeil, Melissa Renner and Michelle Palpant, Defendants-Appellants, and
Kristen Isom, James Hartley, Debi Wagner, Lori Cole, and Judy Hayes, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
DETROIT FREE PRESS, INC. v. City of Southfield
713 N.W.2d 776 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
713 N.W.2d 776, 475 Mich. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-parents-teachers-together-mich-2006.