Smith v. Palmeri

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Palmeri

53 A.D.2d 691, 385 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13441

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 691 (Smith v. Palmeri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Palmeri, 53 A.D.2d 691, 385 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover the value of legal services rendered, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 6, 1976, which, inter alia, (1) denied her motion for summary judgment and (2) granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment to the extent of awarding them partial summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Upon the record before us, the services performed by plaintiffs were reasonable and necessary and they are entitled to a fee therefor. The amount thereof will be determined at a hearing to be held pursuant to the order of Special Term. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover the value of legal services rendered, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered February 6, 1976, which, inter alia, (1) denied her motion for summary judgment and (2) granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment to the extent of awarding them partial summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Upon the record before us, the services performed by plaintiffs were reasonable and necessary and they are entitled to a fee therefor. The amount thereof will be determined at a hearing to be held pursuant to the order of Special Term. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 691, 385 N.Y.S.2d 129, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-palmeri-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack