Smith v. Palmer

32 Misc. 737, 66 N.Y.S. 1145
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 737 (Smith v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Palmer, 32 Misc. 737, 66 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record discloses no conflict of evidence, except as to the alleged special agreement about the rate at which visits were to he charged for. Upon the uncontradicted evidence the plaintiff was entitled to receive something. No special defenses were pleaded and none can, therefore, he availed of. The defendant did not make the objection on the trial that the hook of original entries was not produced. If she had the plaintiff might have produced it.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 737, 66 N.Y.S. 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-palmer-nyappterm-1900.