Smith v. Pacific Improvement Co.

181 A.D. 968
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 A.D. 968 (Smith v. Pacific Improvement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Pacific Improvement Co., 181 A.D. 968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Order granting injunction reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff to renew the application at Special Term. Held, that plaintiff should have been required to give security as is provided by section 620 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that the amount thereof should be sufficient to fully indemnify the defendants against any loss by reason of granting the injunction. In view of this disposition it is unnecessary for us to pass upon the appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate, and the appeal from that order is dismissed. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greenwich Towers Associates v. McLean, Grove & Co.
17 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A.D. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-pacific-improvement-co-nyappdiv-1917.