Smith v. Outlaw

Eighth Circuit

Smith v. Outlaw

183 F. App'x 585

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2006·No. Nos. 05-2212, 05-2272·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony S. Smith appeals from the district court’s¹ denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and the court’s denial of his subsequent motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We affirm for the rea[586]*586sons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We grant Smith’s motion to supplement his brief, and we deny as moot his motion to expedite the appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Anthony S. Smith appeals from the district court’s¹ denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and the court’s denial of his subsequent motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We affirm for the rea[586]*586sons stated by the district court in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We grant Smith’s motion to supplement his brief, and we deny as moot his motion to expedite the appeals.

Smith v. Outlaw, 183 F. App'x 585 (8th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

183 F. App'x 585 (Smith v. Outlaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related