Smith v. O'Reilly Elevator Co.
This text of 64 So. 494 (Smith v. O'Reilly Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.
Judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing plaintiff’s suit was read and signed in open court on January 21, 1913.
On December 5, 1913, by motion made in open court, plaintiff obtained an order for a devolutive appeal from said judgment, and on December 10, 1913, perfected said appeal by filing bond in the sum fixed by the court.
Defendant has moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that no citation of appeal was ever prayed for by the appellant, or issued or served herein, and that, as the motion for appeal was granted at a subsequent term of the court, citation to the appellee was essential.
By Act No. 4 of 1896, p. 5,-the terms of the civil district court for the parish of Orleans begin on October 15th, and terminate- at the end of June, of each year. Hence the motion for the appeal was filed at the next term of the court. The record does not show that the appellant prayed for citation to the appellee, or that the latter was cited.
It is well settled that, when an appeal is taken at a subsequent term, the appellee must be cited. McGaw v. O’Bierne, 124 La. 989, 50 South. 819; Gagneaux v. Desonier, 109 La. 460, 33 South. 561; Wheeler & Pierson v. Peterkin et al., 38 La. Ann. 663; Trousten & [637]*637Co. v. Ware & Munn, 39 La. Ann. 939, 3 South. 122.
It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 So. 494, 134 La. 635, 1914 La. LEXIS 1636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-oreilly-elevator-co-la-1914.