Smith v. O'Reilly Elevator Co.

64 So. 494, 134 La. 635, 1914 La. LEXIS 1636
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 16, 1914
DocketNo. 20,406
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 64 So. 494 (Smith v. O'Reilly Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. O'Reilly Elevator Co., 64 So. 494, 134 La. 635, 1914 La. LEXIS 1636 (La. 1914).

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

LAND, J.

Judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing plaintiff’s suit was read and signed in open court on January 21, 1913.

On December 5, 1913, by motion made in open court, plaintiff obtained an order for a devolutive appeal from said judgment, and on December 10, 1913, perfected said appeal by filing bond in the sum fixed by the court.

Defendant has moved to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that no citation of appeal was ever prayed for by the appellant, or issued or served herein, and that, as the motion for appeal was granted at a subsequent term of the court, citation to the appellee was essential.

By Act No. 4 of 1896, p. 5,-the terms of the civil district court for the parish of Orleans begin on October 15th, and terminate- at the end of June, of each year. Hence the motion for the appeal was filed at the next term of the court. The record does not show that the appellant prayed for citation to the appellee, or that the latter was cited.

It is well settled that, when an appeal is taken at a subsequent term, the appellee must be cited. McGaw v. O’Bierne, 124 La. 989, 50 South. 819; Gagneaux v. Desonier, 109 La. 460, 33 South. 561; Wheeler & Pierson v. Peterkin et al., 38 La. Ann. 663; Trousten & [637]*637Co. v. Ware & Munn, 39 La. Ann. 939, 3 South. 122.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, with costs.

PROVOSTY, J., being absent on account of illness, takes no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Townsend v. Graham
108 So. 2d 103 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1959)
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Parker
84 So. 2d 841 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1956)
Hunt v. Hunt
185 So. 284 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
Vallon v. Morris Cleaners &. Dyers, Inc.
167 So. 887 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Officer v. American Ins. Co.
162 So. 771 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Loudan v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
161 So. 196 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1935)
Fischer v. Palmisano's Succession
147 So. 554 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
Bass v. Lane
125 So. 853 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1930)
Palmisano & Palmisano v. Bonner
120 So. 630 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1929)
Ducre v. Succession of Ducre
118 So. 864 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
Comire v. Schiro Amusement Co.
6 La. App. 441 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
Lopez v. Duvic
14 Teiss. 239 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1917)
King v. First Methodist Church
69 So. 593 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 So. 494, 134 La. 635, 1914 La. LEXIS 1636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-oreilly-elevator-co-la-1914.