Smith v. Orange County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smith v. Orange County

520 So. 2d 305, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 329, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 336, 1988 WL 6427

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1106

StatusPublished

This text of 520 So. 2d 305 (Smith v. Orange County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Orange County, 520 So. 2d 305, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 329, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 336, 1988 WL 6427 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a wrongful employment termination case. Because there are disputed issues of fact left unresolved we reverse the judgment. For instance, while it is the appellees’ contention appellant was hired around the end of September or the beginning of October, the appellant appears to be correct in his contention he began to work for the county on June 1. If he is correct then he may be entitled to certain procedural due process protections which were denied him by the county. The sum[306]*306mary judgment is reversed. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

REVERSED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a wrongful employment termination case. Because there are disputed issues of fact left unresolved we reverse the judgment. For instance, while it is the appellees’ contention appellant was hired around the end of September or the beginning of October, the appellant appears to be correct in his contention he began to work for the county on June 1. If he is correct then he may be entitled to certain procedural due process protections which were denied him by the county. The sum[306]*306mary judgment is reversed. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

REVERSED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

520 So. 2d 305, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 329, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 336, 1988 WL 6427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-orange-county-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack