Smith v. Ooms
166 F.2d 211, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 402
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided September 30, 1947·No. No. 9399·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This is a suit to obtain a patent. R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. The Patent Office found that the claims lacked invention. The finding was a reasonable one. The District Court was therefore right in dismissing the bill. Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D. C. 195, 109 F.2d 449.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Ooms, 166 F.2d 211, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 402 (D.C. Cir. 1947).
166 F.2d 211 (Smith v. Ooms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co.
182 F.2d 507 (Fourth Circuit, 1950)
Smith v. Kingsland, Commissioner of Patents
178 F.2d 26 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)