Smith v. Ooms
166 F.2d 211, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 402
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 1947
DocketNo. 9399
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 166 F.2d 211 (Smith v. Ooms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Ooms, 166 F.2d 211, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 402 (D.C. Cir. 1947).
Opinion
This is a suit to obtain a patent. R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. The Patent Office found that the claims lacked invention. The finding was a reasonable one. The District Court was therefore right in dismissing the bill. Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D. C. 195, 109 F.2d 449.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co.
182 F.2d 507 (Fourth Circuit, 1950)
Smith v. Kingsland, Commissioner of Patents
178 F.2d 26 (D.C. Circuit, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 F.2d 211, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-ooms-cadc-1947.