Smith v. of Brisbane
3 S.C.L. 455
Opinion
were of opinion, that the district court had properly decided ; and that the plaintiff was intitled to amend his writ, by adding “ administrator of William Brisbane,” so as to make it conform to the record produced. See Str. 890. Cro. Jac. 372. Cro. Car. 162. 1 Salk. 52. 1 Com. Rep. 418.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. of Brisbane, 3 S.C.L. 455 (S.C. 1804).
3 S.C.L. 455 (Smith v. of Brisbane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.