Smith v. Oakley
This text of 220 S.E.2d 689 (Smith v. Oakley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this original proceeding in prohibition the relator, Denny Smith, seeks to prohibit the respondent, Harvey Oakley, Judge of the Circuit Court of Logan County, from proceeding with the trial on an indictment charging said relator with a violation under W. Va. Code, 1931, 61-6-7, sometimes referred to as the Red Men’s Act.
In an indictment returned by the grand jury serving the Circuit Court of Logan County, it was charged that the relator, Denny Smith, together with five other named defendants, “did unlawfully and feloniously combine, conspire and confederate together for the purpose of inflicting bodily injury upon one Hubert Evans and in pursuance of said combination, conspiracy and confederation ... the said Denny Smith [and other named defendants] did unlawfully, willfully and feloniously beat, wound and inflict bodily injury upon him, the said Hubert Evans ....”
The issue in this proceeding concerns the constitutionality of W. Va. Code, 1931, 61-6-7. The Court holds that in the above circumstances the decision of this case is governed by the principles enunciated and applied in Clayton Bill Pinkerton, et al. v. P. Douglass Farr, Judge of *236 the Circuit Court of Pleasants County, W. Va., -- W. Va. _ (Decided December 15, 1975). Accordingly, W. Va. Code, 1931, 61-6-7 is declared to be unconstitutional and the relief prayed for is granted.
Writ awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 S.E.2d 689, 159 W. Va. 234, 1975 W. Va. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-oakley-wva-1975.