Smith v. Nuckolls

120 S.E.2d 326, 103 Ga. App. 733, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1043
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 18, 1961
Docket38830
StatusPublished

This text of 120 S.E.2d 326 (Smith v. Nuckolls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Nuckolls, 120 S.E.2d 326, 103 Ga. App. 733, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1043 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

On the appeal of this case from the court of ordinary to the superior court it was not error for the court to overrule the general demurrer to a petition filed in the court of ordinary by T. L. Nuckolls in which he sought to have set aside a judgment of the ordinary adjudging petitioner insane and ordering him committed to the Milledgeville State Hospital, the ground of which petition to set aside being that the three nearest relatives of petitioner were not notified of the hearing of the proceedings to have petitioner declared insane. Such notice is necessary to the validity of an adjudication in a case where there are such relatives who can be served. Morton v. Sims, 64 Ga. 298 (1); Yeomans v. Williams, 117 Ga. 800, 803 (45 S. E. 73); Singer v. Middleton, 135 Ga. 825 (1) (70 S. E. 662); Milam v. Terrell, 214 Ga. 199, 202 (104 S. E. 2d 219); Anderson v. Smith, 76 Ga. App. 171 (45 S. E. 2d 282); White v. Williamson, 44 Ga. App. 428 (1) (161 S. E. 654). The cases cited to the effect that one who has been adjudged insane is not a proper party are not applicable because in those cases there had been a legal adjudication of insanity, whereas here there has been no legal adjudication if the facts alleged in the petition to set aside are true. On the question of venue see Shea v. Gehan, 70 Ga. App. 229 (28 S. E. 2d 181).

The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition to set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell and Hall, JJ., concur. M&rritt & Pruitt, Glyndon C. Pruitt, for plaintiff in error. Leon Boling, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milam v. Terrell
104 S.E.2d 219 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Shea v. Gehan
28 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Anderson v. Smith
45 S.E.2d 282 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Morton v. Sims
64 Ga. 298 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)
Yeomans v. Williams
45 S.E. 73 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Singer v. Middleton
70 S.E. 662 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
White v. Williamson
161 S.E. 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 S.E.2d 326, 103 Ga. App. 733, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-nuckolls-gactapp-1961.