Smith v. North Carolina Mutual Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. North Carolina Mutual Ass'n

90 S.E. 358, 18 Ga. App. 661, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1177

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 18, 1916

Docket7363

StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E. 358 (Smith v. North Carolina Mutual Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. North Carolina Mutual Ass'n, 90 S.E. 358, 18 Ga. App. 661, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1177 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, O. J.

No error of law is complained of. There was evidence to support the finding of the judge, sitting without the intervention of a jury; and this court is therefore without authority to set aside the [662]*662judgment rendered. There was positive testimony that a certain written release was executed by the plaintiff, freely and voluntarily, for a valuable consideration, and there was testimony to the contrary; and the trial judge settled the conflict in favor of the defendant.

Decided October 18, 1916.

Action on insurance policy; from municipal court of Macon— Judge Chambers. February 11, 1916.

H. F. Strohecher, Sam, B. Hunter, for plaintiff. A. T. Walden, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI