Smith v. North Carolina
This text of 54 F. App'x 582 (Smith v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David Lee Smith appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. North Carolina, No. CA-02-688-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Sept. 9, 2002; entered Sept. 10, 2002). We deny Smith’s motions for class certification and a temporary restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. App'x 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-north-carolina-ca4-2003.