Smith v. Norris

202 Ill. App. 416
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 13, 1916·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Assumpsit, action of, § 89*—when evidence in action for money loaned does not support judgment for plaintiff. In an action in assumpsit for money alleged in one count of the declaration to have been loaned to the defendant at his individual request, and in another count alleged to have been loaned to the defendant’s authorized agent, evidence held to show neither a loan to the defendant at his request nor that the alleged agent had authority to borrow money on behalf of the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Norris, 202 Ill. App. 416 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

202 Ill. App. 416 (Smith v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.