Smith v. Norris

Appellate Court of Illinois

Smith v. Norris

202 Ill. App. 416

DecidedOctober 13, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 202 Ill. App. 416 (Smith v. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Norris, 202 Ill. App. 416 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Assumpsit, action of, § 89*—when evidence in action for money loaned does not support judgment for plaintiff. In an action in assumpsit for money alleged in one count of the declaration to have been loaned to the defendant at his individual request, and in another count alleged to have been loaned to the defendant’s authorized agent, evidence held to show neither a loan to the defendant at his request nor that the alleged agent had authority to borrow money on behalf of the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Assumpsit, action of, § 89*—when evidence in action for money loaned does not support judgment for plaintiff. In an action in assumpsit for money alleged in one count of the declaration to have been loaned to the defendant at his individual request, and in another count alleged to have been loaned to the defendant’s authorized agent, evidence held to show neither a loan to the defendant at his request nor that the alleged agent had authority to borrow money on behalf of the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 Ill. App. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-norris-illappct-1916.