Smith v. New York County District Attorney's Office

104 A.D.3d 559, 960 N.Y.S.2d 646

This text of 104 A.D.3d 559 (Smith v. New York County District Attorney's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. New York County District Attorney's Office, 104 A.D.3d 559, 960 N.Y.S.2d 646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Larry Stephen, J.), [560]*560entered on or about October 10, 2012, which directed respondent-appellant to appear as a witness to testify in a criminal proceeding in an Indiana court, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied and the special proceeding brought pursuant to CPL 640.10 dismissed.

The New York District Attorney’s Office concedes that its failure to serve respondent as directed by its order to show cause, which required service of the papers supporting the order, resulted in a lack of personal jurisdiction over respondent (see CPLR 403 [d]; 2214 [d]). Accordingly, denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding is warranted (see Matter of Ruine v Hines, 57 AD3d 369 [1st Dept 2008]; Matter of Feldman v Feldman, 54 AD3d 372, 373 [2d Dept 2008]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feldman v. Feldman
54 A.D.3d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ruine v. Hines
57 A.D.3d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 559, 960 N.Y.S.2d 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-new-york-county-district-attorneys-office-nyappdiv-2013.