Smith v. New York City Housing Authority

130 A.D.3d 427, 11 N.Y.S.3d 484
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 2015·No. 15579 6417/05·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered October 3, 2014, which denied the motion of defendants New York City Housing Authority and Grenadier Realty Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

In this wrongful death action alleging negligent premises security, defendants met their prima facie burden by pointing to undisputed evidence that the assailant remains unknown, and it remains unknown whether he or she was an intruder, as opposed to another tenant or guest lawfully on the premises (see New v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 110 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2013]). Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to “present evidence from which intruder status may reasonably be inferred” (Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92 NY2d 544, 551 [1998]), and in opposition, plaintiff failed to present such evidence. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Friedman, Richter, ManzanetDaniels and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. New York City Housing Authority, 130 A.D.3d 427, 11 N.Y.S.3d 484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

130 A.D.3d 427 (Smith v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morel v. City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 06058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Laniox v. City of New York
2019 NY Slip Op 2026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Patton v. New York City Housing Authority
140 A.D.3d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)