Smith v. New York Central Railroad

180 A.D. 922
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. New York Central Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 183 A.D. 478

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Lambert and De Angelis, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the verdict is excessive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. New York Central Railroad, 180 A.D. 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

180 A.D. 922 (Smith v. New York Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.