Smith v. New Jersey & Hudson River Railway & Ferry Co.
This text of 123 A.D. 493 (Smith v. New Jersey & Hudson River Railway & Ferry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff should not be allowed to prosecute her action if she persists in her refusal to submit to the examination authorized by the Code of Civil Procedure
Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, J J.
Order modified as directed in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Settle order on notice.
See § 873.—[Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 A.D. 493, 108 N.Y.S. 415, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-new-jersey-hudson-river-railway-ferry-co-nyappdiv-1908.