Smith v. National R.R. Passenger Corp.
This text of 919 F.2d 141 (Smith v. National R.R. Passenger Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Ira G. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, t/a Amtrak, et al.,
Max Krantz, t/a Maxway Trucking, Inc., Empire
Detroit Steel Company, A division of
Cyclops Corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-3059.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 3, 1990.
Before WELLFORD and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and FORESTER, District Judge.*
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable Karl S. Forester, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
919 F.2d 141, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21072, 1990 WL 191627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-national-rr-passenger-corp-ca6-1990.