Smith v. Natali

68 A.D.3d 1768, 890 N.Y.2d 848

This text of 68 A.D.3d 1768 (Smith v. Natali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Natali, 68 A.D.3d 1768, 890 N.Y.2d 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Memorandum: Petitioner mother appeals from an order [1769]*1769dismissing her petition seeking custody of her child. We reject her contention that Family Court’s determination lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record and thus that the court should have granted her petition (see Matter of Harrington v Harrington, 63 AD3d 1618 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 705 [2009]). Although there is some evidence in the record that respondent father actively interfered with the mother’s relationship with the child (see Matter of Irwin v Neyland, 213 AD2d 773, 774 [1995]), other factors support the court’s determination and we accord great deference to that determination (see Matter of Thayer v Ennis, 292 AD2d 824, 825 [2002]). The record does not support the further contention of the mother that she did not receive effective assistance of counsel (see generally Matter of Howard v McLoughlin, 64 AD3d 1147 [2009]). We note in particular that there was extensive cross-examination of the parties, and that the court had issued decisions with respect to previous petitions by both parties and thus was familiar with the circumstances of the case. Present — Hurlbutt, J.P, Smith, Fahey and Garni, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrington v. Harrington
63 A.D.3d 1618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Howard v. McLoughlin
64 A.D.3d 1147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Irwin v. Neyland
213 A.D.2d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Thayer v. Ennis
292 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 1768, 890 N.Y.2d 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-natali-nyappdiv-2009.