Smith v. Naphtaly
73 F. 128, 19 C.C.A. 682, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1785
This text of 73 F. 128 (Smith v. Naphtaly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Naphtaly, 73 F. 128, 19 C.C.A. 682, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1785 (9th Cir. 1896).
Opinion
From the action of the court below in sustaining a demurrer to the bill in this case, the complainant appealed. The merits of the case are covered by the decision in the case of Beley v. Naphtaly (just filed) 73 Fed. 120. It is not necessary to do more than to refer to the reasons there given in support of our judgment affirming that of the court below. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Beley v. Naphtaly
73 F. 120 (Ninth Circuit, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
73 F. 128, 19 C.C.A. 682, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-naphtaly-ca9-1896.