Smith v. Naphtaly

73 F. 128, 19 C.C.A. 682, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1785
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 3, 1896·No. No. 262·Published

Opinion

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

From the action of the court below in sustaining a demurrer to the bill in this case, the complainant appealed. The merits of the case are covered by the decision in the case of Beley v. Naphtaly (just filed) 73 Fed. 120. It is not necessary to do more than to refer to the reasons there given in support of our judgment affirming that of the court below. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Naphtaly, 73 F. 128, 19 C.C.A. 682, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1785 (9th Cir. 1896).

73 F. 128 (Smith v. Naphtaly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beley v. Naphtaly
73 F. 120 (Ninth Circuit, 1896)