Smith v. Naphtaly
73 F. 128, 19 C.C.A. 682, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1785
Opinion
From the action of the court below in sustaining a demurrer to the bill in this case, the complainant appealed. The merits of the case are covered by the decision in the case of Beley v. Naphtaly (just filed) 73 Fed. 120. It is not necessary to do more than to refer to the reasons there given in support of our judgment affirming that of the court below. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Naphtaly, 73 F. 128, 19 C.C.A. 682, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1785 (9th Cir. 1896).
73 F. 128 (Smith v. Naphtaly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beley v. Naphtaly
73 F. 120 (Ninth Circuit, 1896)