Smith v. Mulligan
This text of 11 Abb. Pr. 438 (Smith v. Mulligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The deceased John Mulligan was a citizen, and therefore could hold and transmit property. If an heir capable of taking can be found, the estate will descend to such heir (Parish v. Ward, 28 Barb., 328). .
The fact of the alienage of a common father, will not impede the inheritance between brothers; the inheritance between brothers is immediate (McGregor v. Comstock, 3 N. Y. [3 Comst.], 408).
This doctrine is not questioned in McLean v. Swanston (13 N. Y. [3 Kern.], 535). In that case, the title, to have reached the plaintiff, must have passed through an alien. In this case the father is not a medium heriditatis.
Order affirmed with costs.
Present, J. F. Barnard, P. J., and Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Abb. Pr. 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mulligan-nysupct-1871.