Smith v. Moss

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Smith v. Moss

301 S.W.2d 2

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedFebruary 22, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 301 S.W.2d 2 (Smith v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Moss, 301 S.W.2d 2 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We consider this motion for an appeal under KRS 21.080. The value of the property in controversy is not shown “certainly” to be as much as $2,500 by the final order issuing a Writ of Possession; nor did the movant request the trial judge to fix the value of the property under KRS 21.070. We must assume, therefore, that the jurisdictional amount is less than $2,500. See Bowling v. Bowling, Ky., 283 S.W.2d 837. There is no error apparent in the record.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We consider this motion for an appeal under KRS 21.080. The value of the property in controversy is not shown “certainly” to be as much as $2,500 by the final order issuing a Writ of Possession; nor did the movant request the trial judge to fix the value of the property under KRS 21.070. We must assume, therefore, that the jurisdictional amount is less than $2,500. See Bowling v. Bowling, Ky., 283 S.W.2d 837. There is no error apparent in the record.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 S.W.2d 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-moss-kyctapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack