Smith v. Moss
301 S.W.2d 2
Opinion
We consider this motion for an appeal under KRS 21.080. The value of the property in controversy is not shown “certainly” to be as much as $2,500 by the final order issuing a Writ of Possession; nor did the movant request the trial judge to fix the value of the property under KRS 21.070. We must assume, therefore, that the jurisdictional amount is less than $2,500. See Bowling v. Bowling, Ky., 283 S.W.2d 837. There is no error apparent in the record.
The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Moss, 301 S.W.2d 2 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).
301 S.W.2d 2 (Smith v. Moss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Creech v. Jackson
375 S.W.2d 679 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1964)
Moss v. Smith
361 S.W.2d 511 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1962)
Hoy v. Newburg Homes, Inc.
325 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1959)