Smith v. Morgan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2444
JOHN M. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BARBARA A. MORGAN, Individually and as Solic- itor for the Second Judicial Circuit of the State of South Carolina,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
BUSTER EDWARDS, Individually and as Agent of State Law Enforcement Division, an Agency of the State of South Carolina; STATE LAW EN- FORCEMENT DIVISION, an Agency of the State of South Carolina,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA- 96-2763-8-1)
Submitted: May 11, 1999 Decided: May 27, 1999
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lex A. Rogerson, Jr., Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellant. Paul H. Derrick, LIDE, MONTGOMERY & POTTS, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
John M. Smith appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Appellee Morgan on his 42 U.S.C.A.
§ 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. On appeal, Smith frames the
issue as whether the district court erred in holding that his
claims against Morgan for acts alleged to be outside of the scope
of her prosecutorial immunity were barred by res judicata. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the dis-
trict court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Morgan (Smith v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.