Smith v. Monroe

363 S.W.3d 60, 2011 WL 6299955, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1663
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2011·No. ED 96657·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, John H. Smith, acting pro se, appeals from the judgment in favor of defendants denying his Petition For Conversion of Money and Personal Property in which he sought actual, punitive, and special damages based on the alleged seizure of U.S. currency and other items of personal property from his home on October 2, 2002. All of the defendants, with one exception, were alleged to be employees or officers of a governmental entity. The one exception was alleged to be a co-conspirator with the others. The trial court reviewed the petition pursuant to the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, section 506.360, et seq. RSMo (2000), and denied the petition with prejudice based on the doctrine of res judicata.

No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Monroe, 363 S.W.3d 60, 2011 WL 6299955, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

363 S.W.3d 60 (Smith v. Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hankins v. Abeyta
363 S.W.3d 60 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)