Smith v. Miele

62 A.2d 826, 1 N.J. Super. 158, 1948 N.J. Super. LEXIS 472
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedDecember 29, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.2d 826 (Smith v. Miele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Miele, 62 A.2d 826, 1 N.J. Super. 158, 1948 N.J. Super. LEXIS 472 (N.J. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

This workmen's compensation case comes up on certiorari to the Essex County Court of Common Pleas, now the Essex County Court. In the compensation bureau, plaintiff had an award based upon a finding of partial dependency. The county court reversed and dismissed the petition on the ground that any finding of the amount of decedent's contributions "would have to rest on speculation, rather than credible evidence. The burden of proof has therefore not been sustained by the petitioner."

We have studied the record bearing in mind that the deputy commissioner had the advantage of personal observation and consequently was in a better position to judge of credibility than an appellate tribunal and we find the facts to be that on July 9, 1945, Thomas Jackson, 19, was killed in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by Andrew H. Miele and Frank Miele, trading as Miele Brothers. For the week preceding the date of his death, he was paid $33.36. He left surviving his mother, Clara Smith; his grandmother, Emily Jackson and a half sister, Louise Wilkes. He lived in the household with Emily Jackson and Louise Wilkes and the undisputed testimony is that he gave to his mother, Clara Smith, $30. each week, of which she retained $10. toward her support and turned over $20. to the grandmother and the half sister toward their support. It follows therefrom that Clara Smith, Emily Jackson and Louise Wilkes were partial dependents within the meaning of R.S. 34:15-13 (g) and accordingly the judgment of the county court is reversed and the award entered in the Workmen's Compensation Bureau is affirmed with costs. *Page 160

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.2d 826, 1 N.J. Super. 158, 1948 N.J. Super. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-miele-njsuperctappdiv-1948.