Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 9, 2011

Docket2011-3127

StatusUnpublished

This text of Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ETHEL M. SMITH, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ' 2011-3127 . Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC0845100323-I-}.. ON MOTION ORDER Ethe1 L. Sn1ith moves for a 60-day extension of time to file her Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning dis- crimination and to pay the filing fee. Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED TH_/-irc

SMITH V. MSPB 2 The motion is granted The fee, Rule 15(c) statement, and informal brief are due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. FoR THE CoURT 0 9 /s/ Jan Hor‘0aly Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Ethe1 M. Smith (Ru1e 15(c), in forma pauperis and informal brief forms enclosed) Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq. s21 'FII.ED I.s.c0um' or ma ms FEnERA’i.Peil'fef:i1sn HAY 0 9 2011 lA|l|'I9RBA|.¥ ClElII

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ETHEL M. SMITH, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ' 2011-3127 . Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC0845100323-I-}.. ON MOTION ORDER Ethe1 L. Sn1ith moves for a 60-day extension of time to file her Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning dis- crimination and to pay the filing fee. Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDERED TH_/-irc

SMITH V. MSPB 2 The motion is granted The fee, Rule 15(c) statement, and informal brief are due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. FoR THE CoURT 0 9 /s/ Jan Hor‘0aly Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Ethe1 M. Smith (Ru1e 15(c), in forma pauperis and informal brief forms enclosed) Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq. s21 'FII.ED I.s.c0um' or ma ms FEnERA’i.Peil'fef:i1sn HAY 0 9 2011 lA|l|'I9RBA|.¥ ClElII

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.