Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 13, 2010

Docket2010-3099

StatusUnpublished

This text of Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia|. United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit 2010-3099 EUGENE SMlTH, Petitioner, v. MER|T SYSTEMS PROTECTlON BOARD, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC3443090556-l-1. ON MOTl0N 0 R D E R The Ofiice of Personne| Management moves without opposition to refom1 the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The deciding agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. in this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent. According|y, lT lS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above FOR THE COURT HAY 1 3 2313 lsi Jan Horba|v Date fix Jan l-lorba|y 1 Clerk cc: Eugene Smith Antonia R. Soares, Esq. Sara B. Rearden, Esq. u_s_ c0m;FHp-EAPPEALS FOR - THE FEnr:RAL cmcurT 820 mr 13 2010 wausau CLERK 2010-3099 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia|. United States Court of Appea|s for the Federal Circuit 2010-3099 EUGENE SMlTH, Petitioner, v. MER|T SYSTEMS PROTECTlON BOARD, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC3443090556-l-1. ON MOTl0N 0 R D E R The Ofiice of Personne| Management moves without opposition to refom1 the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The deciding agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. in this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent. According|y, lT lS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above FOR THE COURT HAY 1 3 2313 lsi Jan Horba|v Date fix Jan l-lorba|y 1 Clerk cc: Eugene Smith Antonia R. Soares, Esq. Sara B. Rearden, Esq. u_s_ c0m;FHp-EAPPEALS FOR - THE FEnr:RAL cmcurT 820 mr 13 2010 wausau CLERK 2010-3099 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack