Smith v. Meehan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Meehan

211 A.D.2d 605, 621 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 4, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.D.2d 605 (Smith v. Meehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Meehan, 211 A.D.2d 605, 621 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, to prohibit the respondent Judge from presiding over any further proceedings in the criminal action under Rockland County Indictment No. 137/94.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Smith v Gribetz, 211 AD2d 605 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt, Miller and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, to prohibit the respondent Judge from presiding over any further proceedings in the criminal action under Rockland County Indictment No. 137/94.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Smith v Gribetz, 211 AD2d 605 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt, Miller and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 605, 621 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-meehan-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack