Smith v. Meegan
This text of 22 Mo. 150 (Smith v. Meegan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The defendant was bound to use at least ordinary care for the preservation of the plaintiff’s boat, and if he launched it into the river at a time and under circumstances of great danger, which ought to have been foreseen, and which resulted in the destruction of the boat, notwithstanding the use of all proper care on the plaintiff’s part, he must bear the loss occasioned by his own improper conduct. This is the case substantially presented by the petition, and the judgment must therefore be reversed, and the cause remanded, in order that the matter may be tried upon the proof.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Mo. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-meegan-mo-1855.