Smith v. Mediplex of Westport

871 A.2d 1025, 273 Conn. 508, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 155
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Mediplex of Westport. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 Conn. 916
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 10, 2005·No. SC 17210·Published

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The substitute plaintiff, Merilyn Smith, executrix of the estate of the plaintiff decedent, Marie Smith,1 brought an action against the defendant physi[509] cian, Joanne C. Reisch,2 for medical malpractice regarding treatment of the decedent.3 After a defendant’s verdict by the jury and judgment on the verdict, the plaintiff attempted pro se4 to appeal from the judgment to the Appellate Court.

The Appellate Court dismissed the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court on the basis of late filing, the appeal having been filed one day late. The plaintiff moved for permission to file a late motion for reconsideration of the order of dismissal. The Appellate Court denied that motion. We then granted the plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss this appeal for late filing?” Smith v. Mediplex of Westport, 269 Conn. 916, 852 A.2d 744 (2004). This certified appeal by the plaintiff followed.

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Mediplex of Westport, 871 A.2d 1025, 273 Conn. 508, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 155 (Colo. 2005).

871 A.2d 1025 (Smith v. Mediplex of Westport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Mediplex of Westport
852 A.2d 744 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)