Smith v. McLaughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. McLaughlin

246 A.D. 880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 880 (Smith v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. McLaughlin, 246 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Motions in negligence actions to change the place of trial from Schenectady county, where plaintiffs reside and where the actions were brought, to Bronx county, the place where the accident happened. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one action. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to grant the motion, on the ground that Bronx is the proper county, that the accident occurred in Bronx county, and that a majority of the material witnesses reside therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motions in negligence actions to change the place of trial from Schenectady county, where plaintiffs reside and where the actions were brought, to Bronx county, the place where the accident happened. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one action. Hill, P. J., Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; McNamee and Heffernan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and to grant the motion, on the ground that Bronx is the proper county, that the accident occurred in Bronx county, and that a majority of the material witnesses reside therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mclaughlin-nyappdiv-1936.