Smith v. McFall

1 Smith & H. 76
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1848
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Smith & H. 76 (Smith v. McFall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. McFall, 1 Smith & H. 76 (Ind. 1848).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— “The cause of action is alleged to be deficient, in not stating that a demand had been made of the defendants for the damages assessed, before the suit was brought. The 7th section of the chapter above referred to, provides that upon filing such certificate the justice shall issue his summons, &e. It is true, the section immediately preceding requires a demand to be made before the right of action accrues, but though it would be necessary to prove upon the trial that such demand had been made, the only cause of action required to be filed is the certificate. It has been decided that in actions of debt on penal bonds conditioned for the performance of covenants, before a justice of the peace, no statement of the demand, except the filing of the bond, is necessary. Olds v. The State, 6 Blackf. 91.”

Judgment reversed, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hannum v. Borough of West Chester
63 Pa. 475 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Smith & H. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mcfall-ind-1848.