Smith v. McDaniel
399 F. App'x 278
This text of 399 F. App'x 278 (Smith v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. McDaniel, 399 F. App'x 278 (9th Cir. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
Under Thompson v. Frank, 599 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam), we lack appellate jurisdiction to review the [279]*279district court’s stay-and-abeyance order. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thompson v. Frank
599 F.3d 1088 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
399 F. App'x 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mcdaniel-ca9-2010.