Smith v. Matten, L-07-1408 (8-22-2008)

2008 Ohio 4275
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 22, 2008
DocketNos. L-07-1408, L-07-1409, L-07-1365.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2008 Ohio 4275 (Smith v. Matten, L-07-1408 (8-22-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Matten, L-07-1408 (8-22-2008), 2008 Ohio 4275 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

DECISION AND JUDGMENT
{¶ 1} Appellant, American Family Insurance Company, appeals from a judgment from the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to appellees, the city of Toledo and James Matten. We have sua sponte placed this appeal on the accelerated calendar pursuant to 6th Dist. Loc. App. R. 12(A). "The purpose of an *Page 2 accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusive decision." Kellon v. Cleveland Marshall College ofLaw (1995), 102 Ohio App.3d 684, 685.

{¶ 2} Appellant asserts one assignment of error:

{¶ 3} "The trial court erred when it found the AF policy provision excluding a vehicle owned or operated by a governmental unit of agency from the definition of uninsured motor vehicle void as against public policy."

{¶ 4} Recently, the Supreme Court of Ohio in Rogers v. Dayton, 118 Ohio St.3d 299, 2008-Ohio-2336, held, in its syllabus that "[A] political subdivision is self-insured for purposes of former R.C. 3937.18(K)(3) if it qualifies as a self-insurer under R.C. Chapter 4509, although it is not required to obtain a certificate of self-insurance."

{¶ 5} On the above authority, appellant's sole assignment of error is found well-taken.

{¶ 6} On consideration whereof, we find that substantial justice was not done the party complaining and the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs to appellees pursuant to App. R. 24. Judgment for the clerk's expense incurred in preparation of the record, fees allowed by law, and the fee for filing the appeal is awarded to Lucas County.

JUDGMENT REVERSED.

*Page 3

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App. R. 27. See, also, 6th Dist. Loc. App. R. 4.

Arlene Singer, J., William J. Skow, J., Thomas J. Osowik, J., CONCUR.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kellon v. Cleveland Marshall College of Law
657 N.E.2d 835 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1995)
Rogers v. City of Dayton
888 N.E.2d 1081 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2008 Ohio 4275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-matten-l-07-1408-8-22-2008-ohioctapp-2008.