Smith v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Maryland Casualty Co.

144 A.D.2d 940, 535 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14405

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.2d 940 (Smith v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Maryland Casualty Co., 144 A.D.2d 940, 535 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14405 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated at Special Term, Rath, J. We add only that plaintiff failed to give timely notice of her intention to rely on statutes of the Province of Ontario by referring to them for the first time in a reply brief (see, CPLR 4511 [b]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J. — declaratory judgment.) Present —Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated at Special Term, Rath, J. We add only that plaintiff failed to give timely notice of her intention to rely on statutes of the Province of Ontario by referring to them for the first time in a reply brief (see, CPLR 4511 [b]). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, J. — declaratory judgment.) Present —Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.2d 940, 535 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-maryland-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1988.