Smith v. Marquis

120 N.E.3d 865, 2019 Ohio 1315, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1418
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 2019·No. 2018-0369·Published

Opinion

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

Sua sponte, Ohio Public Defender appointed to represent appellant for the pendency of this appeal. Sua sponte, parties ordered to file supplemental briefs in this case addressing the following question: "Does the procedural error in the juvenile-bindover proceeding create a jurisdictional defect that deprived the general division of the common pleas court of subject-matter jurisdiction?" Appellant shall file his supplemental brief within 30 days. Appellee's supplemental brief is due within 20 days of the filing of appellant's supplemental brief. No reply briefs or requests or stipulations for extension of time shall be filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Marquis, 120 N.E.3d 865, 2019 Ohio 1315, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1418 (Ohio 2019).

120 N.E.3d 865 (Smith v. Marquis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.