Smith v. Marquis
This text of 120 N.E.3d 865 (Smith v. Marquis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING
Sua sponte, Ohio Public Defender appointed to represent appellant for the pendency of this appeal. Sua sponte, parties ordered to file supplemental briefs in this case addressing the following question: "Does the procedural error in the juvenile-bindover proceeding create a jurisdictional defect that deprived the general division of the common pleas court of subject-matter jurisdiction?" Appellant shall file his supplemental brief within 30 days. Appellee's supplemental brief is due within 20 days of the filing of appellant's supplemental brief. No reply briefs or requests or stipulations for extension of time shall be filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 N.E.3d 865, 2019 Ohio 1315, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-marquis-ohio-2019.