Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. Marion Harper Cotton Oil Co.

Smith v. Marion Harper Cotton Oil Co.

121 S.E. 256, 31 Ga. App. 546, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 36
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 16, 1924
Docket15034
StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E. 256 (Smith v. Marion Harper Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Marion Harper Cotton Oil Co., 121 S.E. 256, 31 Ga. App. 546, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 36 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and no legal reason for a reversal of the judgment is shown in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 256, 31 Ga. App. 546, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-marion-harper-cotton-oil-co-gactapp-1924.