Smith v. Marbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Marbury

18 A.D.2d 936, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 936 (Smith v. Marbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Marbury, 18 A.D.2d 936, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury sustained by plaintiff as the result of the defendant’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 15, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and set the case down for assessment! of damages. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. A question of fact is presented as to whether plaintiff sustained any injury at all (Ruppert v. Building Materials Dist., 10 A D 2d 621; Rubin v. Andino, 11 A D 2d 663; Sonnino v. Gol-Pak Corp., 15 A D 2d 740, 741). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury sustained by plaintiff as the result of the defendant’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 15, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and set the case down for assessment! of damages. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. A question of fact is presented as to whether plaintiff sustained any injury at all (Ruppert v. Building Materials Dist., 10 A D 2d 621; Rubin v. Andino, 11 A D 2d 663; Sonnino v. Gol-Pak Corp., 15 A D 2d 740, 741). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 936, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-marbury-nyappdiv-1963.