Smith v. Majestic Iron Works, Inc.

136 N.E.2d 923, 1 N.Y.2d 925
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 11, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 136 N.E.2d 923 (Smith v. Majestic Iron Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Majestic Iron Works, Inc., 136 N.E.2d 923, 1 N.Y.2d 925 (N.Y. 1956).

Opinion

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel granted and William Friedman, Esq., 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, assigned as counsel to appellant on the appeal herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 N.E.2d 923, 1 N.Y.2d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-majestic-iron-works-inc-ny-1956.