Smith v. Maine Boys Tunnel Co.
This text of 18 Cal. 111 (Smith v. Maine Boys Tunnel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Field, C. J. concurring.
The plaintiff has mistaken his remedy. If his stock has been improperly sold, he m'ay maintain an action for its recovery, but he cannot sue the corporation for a specific interest in the corporate property. It appears that he was one of the original corporators, and that the property in question has been held as corporate property from the time the corporation was formed. Under these circumstances he should not, we think, be permitted to question the title of the corporation, particularly as the property is a mining claim and could only be held by occupation and possession.
This view is decisive of the case, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Cal. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-maine-boys-tunnel-co-cal-1861.