Smith v. Madison Square Press

233 A.D. 704

This text of 233 A.D. 704 (Smith v. Madison Square Press) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Madison Square Press, 233 A.D. 704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order modified so as to direct the defendant to serve a bill of particulars of the third defense contained in the amended answer as follows: (a) The duties which plaintiff failed to perform; (b) the times and the places where he was intoxicated; (c) when and where he offended customers and who the customers are whom he offended; (d) how, when and in what respects he was incompetent and inefficient, and (e) wherein he was guilty of neglect of duty. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant; the particulars to be served within ten days after service of a copy of the order to be entered herein. The plaintiff is entitled to know in what respect the defendant claims that he did not faithfully perform the agreement, etc. (Stern v. Bellas, Hess & Co., 166 App. Div. 806), and the names of the customers who are claimed to have been offended and alienated may be required. (Evening Herald Co. v. Kilmer, 167 App. Div. 399.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stern v. Bellas, Hess & Co.
166 A.D. 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Evening Herald Co. v. Kilmer
167 A.D. 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-madison-square-press-nyappdiv-1931.