Smith v. Maclin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Maclin

294 A.D.2d 950, 741 N.Y.S.2d 784, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4553

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of [951]*951Family Court, Erie County (Mix, J.), entered April 26, 2000, which dismissed the petition seeking custody.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In April 2000 petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act § 651 seeking custody of her children. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, Family Court properly dismissed the petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing. By an order entered in September 1999, the children were found to be neglected and were released to the custody of their father subject to the supervision of the Erie County Department of Social Services. Petitioner therefore should have filed a petition pursuant to Family Ct Act § 1061 seeking modification of the September 1999 order (see Matter of Davies v Davies, 223 AD2d 884, 886), and her “procedural error in seeking relief under Family Court Act article 6 provides a proper basis for dismissal” (Matter of Matthew W. v Sandra W., 291 AD2d 693, 694). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of [951]*951Family Court, Erie County (Mix, J.), entered April 26, 2000, which dismissed the petition seeking custody.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In April 2000 petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act § 651 seeking custody of her children. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, Family Court properly dismissed the petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing. By an order entered in September 1999, the children were found to be neglected and were released to the custody of their father subject to the supervision of the Erie County Department of Social Services. Petitioner therefore should have filed a petition pursuant to Family Ct Act § 1061 seeking modification of the September 1999 order (see Matter of Davies v Davies, 223 AD2d 884, 886), and her “procedural error in seeking relief under Family Court Act article 6 provides a proper basis for dismissal” (Matter of Matthew W. v Sandra W., 291 AD2d 693, 694). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Smith v. Maclin, 294 A.D.2d 950, 741 N.Y.S.2d 784, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4553 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

294 A.D.2d 950 (Smith v. Maclin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related