Smith v. Macduff
This text of 284 A.D. 966 (Smith v. Macduff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of respondent suspending for thirty days petitioner’s license to operate a motor vehicle, has been transferred to this court pursuant to section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act. Determination annulled, with $10 costs and disbursements, The evidence is insufficient to establish gross negligence. (Matter of Sheridan v. Fletcher, 270 App. Div. 29; Metcalf V. Reynolds, 267 N. Y. 52; Mastruzzi v. Aloi, 269 N. Y. 637; Wylca v. Benedicks, 266 App. Div. 1025.) Nolan, P. J., Adel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 966, 134 N.Y.S.2d 621, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-macduff-nyappdiv-1954.