Smith v. Mabus

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Mabus

428 F. App'x 258

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 10, 2011·No. No. 10-2429·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus, No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus, No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Smith v. Mabus, 428 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

428 F. App'x 258 (Smith v. Mabus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.