Smith v. Mabus
This text of Smith v. Mabus (Smith v. Mabus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2429
BRUCE E. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAY MABUS, Secretary Dept. of the Navy Agency,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: April 27, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce E. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus,
No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered
Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. Mabus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mabus-ca4-2011.