Smith v. Mabus

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 2011
Docket10-2429
StatusUnpublished

This text of Smith v. Mabus (Smith v. Mabus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Mabus, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2429

BRUCE E. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RAY MABUS, Secretary Dept. of the Navy Agency,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: April 27, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce E. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus,

No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered

Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. Mabus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mabus-ca4-2011.