Smith v. Lowery

32 S.E. 1038, 55 S.C. 50, 1899 S.C. LEXIS 86
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Lowery. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 S.C. 493
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 18, 1899·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent, on due notice, having moved this Court to recommit the above stated case to his Honor, Judge R. C. Watts, for a statement from the Judge as to what occurred at the hearing before him on the application for the injunction set out in the “Case.” It is, on motion of W. P. Pollock and Edward Mclver, respondent’s attorneys, Ordered, that the case be recommitted to the Circuit Court for a statement by his Honor, Judge Watts, as to what occurred before him when he granted the order appointing a receiver, as set out in the “Case,” folios 23 to 27. That said statement may be attached to and shall be considered as a part of the “Case” as printed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Lowery, 32 S.E. 1038, 55 S.C. 50, 1899 S.C. LEXIS 86 (S.C. 1899).

32 S.E. 1038 (Smith v. Lowery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.