Smith v. Loudermilk

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. Loudermilk

94 S.E. 808, 21 Ga. App. 511, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 682

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 16, 1917

Docket8594, 8595

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 808 (Smith v. Loudermilk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Loudermilk, 94 S.E. 808, 21 Ga. App. 511, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 682 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the judgment of the ordinary, directing the removal of obstructions from a private way; and upon certiorari and the answer thereto as agreed between the parties, it was error for the judge of the superior court to sustain.', the certiorari and direct a new trial upon any of the grounds urged in the petition therefor.

Judgment on main hill of exceptions reversed, and on cross-hill affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the judgment of the ordinary, directing the removal of obstructions from a private way; and upon certiorari and the answer thereto as agreed between the parties, it was error for the judge of the superior court to sustain.', the certiorari and direct a new trial upon any of the grounds urged in the petition therefor.

Judgment on main hill of exceptions reversed, and on cross-hill affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.E. 808, 21 Ga. App. 511, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-loudermilk-gactapp-1917.